The Supreme Court has stated that an investigation team has been unsuccessful in locating the individual who was responsible for the unauthorized disclosure of a draft of the majority opinion reversing Roe v. Wade:
They conducted 126 official interviews with 97 employees, all of whom denied giving the opinion. The investigation is ongoing.
In spite of these efforts, investigators have not been able to determine at this time, using a preponderance of the evidence standard, the identity of the person(s) who disclosed the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org. or the method by which the draft opinion was provided to Politico. This is the case even though investigators have been able to determine the identity of the person(s) who disclosed the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women
The investigators are still going over the obtained electronic data and processing some of it, and there are still a few additional inquiries that need to be completed.
The investigators are going to follow up on any new evidence or leads that come up as a result of the additional investigation that has been done.
The Supreme Court of the United States interviewed 97 employees and found that none of them had leaked the Roe v. Wade case.
The investigation must now be terminated because it is abundantly evident that no more progress can be made in this area.
This finding is somewhat odd considering less than a week ago, The Wall Street Journal reported that Supreme Court investigators probing the May leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion overruling Roe v. Wade have narrowed their inquiry to a small number of suspects including law clerks, but officials have yet to conclusively identify the alleged culprit, people familiar with the matter said.
Congressional Republicans have complained about the lack of information regarding the source of the leak.
“For some reason this individual has certainly been sheltered and there is absolutely evidence that there are specific people who know who this person is,” Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R., Wis.) said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing in December, when Democrats controlled the chamber now under Republican leadership.
At the same hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), now the House Judiciary Committee chairman, said the committee should itself investigate the leak.
As a reminder, the leak came amid rumors that Chief Justice Roberts was seeking to persuade some members of the court’s conservative majority to join him in a half-step that would partly curb access to abortion, rather than fully eliminating the right, which women had held since the 1973 Roe decision, to end unwanted pregnancies before fetal viability.
Could the leaker have been Roberts? That would explain why they can’t disclose the ‘leaker’, since it would destroy any trust left in the nation’s most sacred institution.
Read the full report below:
Dobbs Public Report January… by Zerohedge
Watch Klaus Schwab Flee From Female Japanese Reporter